Greenbelt Alliance home About Us What We Do Get Involved Resource Center Your Region Join Today!

Home > Resource Center > In the News Home > Greenbelt Alliance in the News

RESOURCE CENTER
· Introduction
· Press Room
· Reports
· Newsletters
· Links
   
RELATED LINKS
· Press Releases
· Greenbelt Alliance in Your Region
 

Sign up for the Greenbelt Newswire and Outings Calendar:




WWW SiteSearch

Greenbelt Alliance In the News


July 5, 2007

'Make or break' study session on Mayfield

Daniel DeBolt



The fate of the Mayfield project may well be decided this Tuesday, when the City Council holds what is likely to be its last study session on the 521-home proposal at 100 Mayfield Ave. A formal decision, however, is months away.

It's a "make or break" study session, said Mayor Laura Macias, "absolutely."

The city has been holding hearings on housing development on the 27 acres at the old Mayfield Mall site for the better part of a decade. After numerous public hearings, "This is the best Toll Brothers can do," Macias said, so it's "either up or down, because I think everyone is ready to move forward or stop it. I don't think anyone wants to do one more study session on Mayfield."
  In March, the recently elected, slower-growth council had some harsh words for the project, which had cleared the rezoning process by the previous council.

" I think this project is absurd as it's proposed," said council member Jac Siegel at the time, regarding the number of units. Macias and council member Ronit Bryant said the large condo buildings would look like "fortresses."

However, Bryant is reluctantly recusing herself from future discussions because her husband works for Hewlett Packard. The company still owns the 27 acres, and would benefit financially from its development.

" When I participated the first time I didn't realize HP was still involved in the process," Bryant said. "I talked to the city attorney and I will have to recuse myself. It's a major issue in town -- I wish I could be involved but at this point I can't."

Since the February study session, Toll Brothers has lowered the number of units in the project on the Mountain View side from 519 to 476 by removing an entire condo building. On the Palo Alto side, the developer continues to plan for 45 homes.

On June 7 the development review committee wasn't pleased with the latest design, and Toll Brothers said major architectural changes were in store.

" Obviously we didn't do a good job," said Toll Brothers division president Rick Nelson. "This has been a challenge for us."

Architecture may be one factor in the project's fate, but it won't be the subject of the upcoming July 10 meeting. Instead, the council will discuss the size and layout of the project, and related things such as park space.

Siegel and Bryant are the major opponents of the project, while members Nick Galiotto, Tom Means and Matt Pear have been relatively supportive. Macias and Margaret Abe-Koga may be the swing votes.

" I would like to see a lower unit count, but as far as what that number is I don't know," Abe-Koga said in March. "They can only go lower ... realistically I think it has to go lower."

Abe-Koga said her concern was how the project "sits with the community." The Monta Loma Neighborhood Association has become highly organized watchdogs of the project, and continues to voice concerns about traffic, parking, housing density and park space.

As far as parks go, the developer is "adding only the amount required," said Elna Tymes, former president of the association.

" Which is admirable," she continued, "but the problem of us being underserved with parks pre-existed them. There aren't many places to build parks. Why can't the city buy an acre or two with their existing park funds?"

For its part, Toll Brothers has been trying to drum up more support for the project, and recently e-mailed the Voice a list of environmental groups that would speak in its favor. Marla Wilson of Greenbelt Alliance was one.

" This is the kind of development Mountain View and the Bay Area needs," Wilson said. She added that the project will provide homes near mass transit. And because it is high density, it lessens the need to build at the city's borders, which helps protect "natural areas and working farms," she said.


Tymes said the green development philosophy is "not a one-size-fits-all solution. There are places where that philosophy works really well such as Capitol Avenue in San Jose. I don't think they've looked at the ramifications of what they are pushing."

Tymes said one of those ramifications will be putting 1,000 more cars on San Antonio Road and Central Expressway, two streets that are already heavily trafficked. And neighbors have questioned the assertion that people will want to use Caltrain instead of their cars.

Wilson, however, disagrees that the single-family homes the neighborhood association wants would help in the long run.

" If this amount of homes were provided in sprawl, the traffic impacts would be a lot greater," she said.

The bottom line, Wilson said, is that the Bay Area will grow by one million people by 2020, and the kind of development proposed by Toll Brothers has become a necessity to make living affordable, both economically and environmentally.


City project manager Peter Gilli said a formal decision on the Mayfield master plan could still be a
year away, but Kelly Snider of Toll Brothers said that "staff has told us the master plan could be approved by the end of this year. We can do that as long as we can get the hearing date scheduled."

Regarding the chances of the project being rejected, Snider said "We're not optimistic or pessimistic, we're just interested."

###

 

  Home | About Us | What We Do | Get Involved | Resource Center | Your Region | Join Today 

©1995-2006 Greenbelt Alliance, 631 Howard Street, Suite 510, San Francisco CA 94105, 415.543.6771, info@greenbelt.org